So I’m indecisive…

October 9, 2008 at 10:22 am (Uncategorized)

I know I just moved in, but it’s kinda restricting and negative here. So I’m moving.

http://skwarehole.wordpress.com/

Permalink Leave a Comment

Earliest evidence of high intensity….

September 29, 2008 at 8:56 pm (being a dork, writing)

In my defense, however, I must say that I’ve lightened up considerably since age 5, and this seriousness followed the death of my great-grandmother. My spelling is also much improved. The handwriting, unfortunately, is not too far off from today’s….

For an idea of just how big I really wrote, this was written on that big manila (or “vanilla,” as I thought it was) paper apparently used only in elementary school.

 

 

 

 
Translation:

All people and animals need water. And food. To make them healthy. Sometimes people do not eat food and water. When people do not eat food and drink water, they die. And people bury them. Some people stay alive until they are 100. Many people do not stay alive until they are 100. Animals do the same thing. Some people and animals get sick. Sometimes the sickness makes them die. That is not funny. That is sad. It is not madness. It is sad.

Permalink 8 Comments

What we really need is one more acronym…

September 29, 2008 at 8:31 pm (being a dork, inventions)

I’m waiting for someone to invent several gadgets. Many are similar in that they would somehow externalize a highly subjective and internal process. Still, I think the dream recorder is the coolest one.

 

A dream recorder does exactly as its name suggests. The reason it appeals to me so much is that, at least for me, there is no way to adequately describe it satisfactorily. While I might be able to include every last detail of the dream, I am unable to place someone else in the very experience of the dream. Somehow, the DR would have to be able to capture the emotional experience as well as the visual elements, else its value is drastically reduced.

 

I don’t draw or paint very well, so I can’t recreate the imagery, much less the motion and mood, of a dream. Even if I could perfectly remember and recreate the vaporous images, I can’t produce in someone else the feelings and thoughts I had about the dream.

 

Take, for example, one of the coolest dreams I’ve had. I was a member of some sort of ancient tribe, climbing a ladder that I can still picture, thought the dream occurred 15 years ago. The ladder was leaned against some sort of Southwestern- or Anasazi-like cliff dwellings, many, many modern stories high. As I reached the top, the other tribe members began shaking the ladder. It wiggled and pitched until the ladder began to fall away from the cliff. As it teetered, I began to sing/chant in a language real-me doesn’t know, yet in the dream, after a moment of confusion, I realized I knew what I was saying. I couldn’t tell you now what it was, but the nature of it was ritualistic and sacred, commanding some sort of spiritual power for something I don’t know.

 

As I try to remember each detail, again, I know I can’t implant in your mind exactly what was there. More importantly, I can’t truly express to you the significance of it, which I only understand in a visceral and non-verbal way. I can’t convey the other-worldliness of the dream, or the sense of it being almost more of a memory than a dream. I know what was happening in my life – or rather, in me – at the time, but I can’t express to you the intensely deep nature of it. Somehow there was a reclaiming of a power that was mine all along, and it wasn’t merely an intellectual exercise, but rather a rearrangement of my psyche almost.

 

To explain it thus trivializes it somehow for me, and I can even hear me trying to explain it out loud to someone: “Yeah, I was this Aztec or something? And I was climbing this ladder and they started shaking it? And I started singing in Spanish and it was sooooo cool. But, um, you probably had to be there.” I think I’ve even told it to someone not much better than this.

 

I suppose the player part of the invention should be a DRE (dream re-experiencer…um…or something) as it’s more accurate. Regardless, it would enable me to not only share my dream with someone who is interested or who I want to understand, but also to re-live it myself. Not only was it a fantastically cool dream worth repeating in and of itself, but perhaps a rerun could serve to reinforce the “lesson” of the dream, too. Though it happened many years ago and I am a different person now than then, I frequently need to be reminded of what I’ve learned (though, once again, “learned” seems inadequate).

 

I’ve always thought it was fun to think about because it’s nothing that would ever happen, more like magic. But I feel sure the Internet and television and radio seemed pure magic to someone in the 15th century, too.

 

[But wait, there’s more… ;) ]

Permalink Leave a Comment

Think you like bread? Think again…

September 26, 2008 at 1:51 pm (being a dork, funny)

http://tinyurl.com/5omafl

(M, I’m really leaving now!)

Permalink 3 Comments

Q-isms

September 26, 2008 at 4:37 am (Q-isms, being a mom)

Mixed fruit = mixed up fruit

creepy = creaky

Fee fie fo fum, I smell the blood of an Englishman = Fee fie fo fum, I smell an English muffin.

Oh, and she said “fixin’ to” for the first time in my memory.

I think I’ll change my blog to “mixed up fruit.” Seems appropriate. ;) Sorry, Jenny. :D

Permalink Leave a Comment

Q and God

September 26, 2008 at 4:32 am (being a mom, spirituality)

For her story tonight, Q chose a book of bible stories (re-)told for small children. My stepmother gave her this book for her birthday last year, but Q has just recently discovered it and really likes it. (I’ll save for another time my other, more complex thoughts/struggles/joys about spirituality and religion and how to relate that to my child.) Suffice it to say that the book doesn’t quite cover my own personal beliefs[i].)

 

Recently we’ve had some discussions about God, and mostly I try to get across to her that God is another word for Love, and it’s all that is good and creative and holds us all together (when, of course, any of us actually *are* together). Inadequate as it may be, that’s the simplest and closest I can come to explaining my version to my preschooler. Oh, and that God lives in our hearts, which is my version of, “God is not an old man in the sky…”

I asked her why she picked that one, just because I was curious what her response would be. She said, “Because I LOVE God!”

 

I responded, “What do you love about God?”

Q: Because He made the night and the day and all the food and the people we love, and, and, and….”

 

We went on to read very sanitized (to my relief) versions of Moses, Noah, David & Goliath, and Jesus stories. She went back to the David & Goliath page, where an illustration of Goliath (who “liked to fight” and was “taken down” by David in this version) showed him lying down, his face inexplicably hidden behind David and some other shepherd-like guys.

 

Q: Why did Goliath like to fight, Mommy?

Me: I don’t really know, honey. I guess he was angry and scared and didn’t know a better way to handle it.

Q: God doesn’t like fighting.

Me: No, I don’t guess He probably likes it very much.

Q: Why did Goliath like to fight?

Me: I think he maybe just didn’t know another way to handle how he felt.

Q: Like me.

Me: Well, maybe, but like all of us, I think. I think we are all learning and trying, and I think that’s something God likes the best.

Q: You know what else God does?

Me: What?

Q: God makes you toot.

Me: What?

Q: God makes you toot. I just tooted, Mommy.

Me: Oh. OK.

 

 

 


[i] An interesting quiz is Belief-O-Matic at Beliefnet.com:

Even if YOU don’t know what faith you are, Belief-O-Matic™ knows. Answer 20 questions about your concept of God, the afterlife, human nature, and more, and Belief-O-Matic™ will tell you what religion (if any) you practice…or ought to consider practicing.”

 

My results are as follows, though they seem different than they were a few years ago when I took this (generally, more Eastern at the top). Mahayana and Theravada Buddhism (even though *I* couldn’t tell you the difference between the two!) were 1 & 2 then, and it seems Taoism and Baha’i were higher then, too. I might know why it’s different, but it doesn’t matter here:

 

 

1. 

Mahayana Buddhism (100%)

2. 

Hinduism (92%)

3. 

Unitarian Universalism (84%)

4. 

New Thought (83%)

5. 

Neo-Pagan (82%)

6. 

Liberal Quakers (76%)

7. 

Jainism (74%)

8. 

Theravada Buddhism (74%)

9. 

New Age (74%)

10. 

Christian Science (Church of Christ, Scientist) (72%)

11. 

Scientology (70%)

12. 

Mainline to Liberal Christian Protestants (65%)

13. 

Reform Judaism (63%)

14. 

Taoism (60%)

15. 

Sikhism (57%)

16. 

Bahá’í Faith (55%)

17. 

Orthodox Judaism (52%)

18. 

Orthodox Quaker (50%)

19. 

Islam (44%)

20. 

Secular Humanism (42%)

21. 

Mainline to Conservative Christian/Protestant (34%)

22. 

Nontheist (26%)

23. 

Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (Mormons) (26%)

24. 

Jehovah’s Witness (26%)

25. 

Seventh Day Adventist (22%)

26. 

Eastern Orthodox (18%)

27. 

Roman Catholic (18%)

 

 

 

Permalink 4 Comments

I’m totally serious when I say….

September 19, 2008 at 5:20 pm (being a dork)

Permalink Leave a Comment

On My Planet, or Insurance That Nobody Will Ever Read This Blog (assuming I tell more than 2 people it exists)

September 19, 2008 at 4:47 pm (ADD, Drift, being a dork, writing) (, , )

This is not really the blog[1] that I wanted to do today. In fact, I am now far too frustrated with myself to even do this one correctly. Sorry in advance for the size of the supposed-to-be-superscripted numbers. I created this in Word and don’t know how to duplicate it in WordPress.

 

I haven’t been doing this long enough to discover what it is my blog wants to be. While trying to allow it to reveal itself to me, I am having many stumbling, stammering fits and starts (but few ends). The short version is this: I need to get back on Ritalin. Seriously. I literally can’t count the number of projects I start and can not complete, and I an becoming increasing annoyed with myself. 

 

I’ve always really enjoyed drifting. The imagery I always think of is from the cartoons when I was a kid. Someone bakes a pie and leaves it on a windowsill (this part I’ve never really understood, but still…) The scent is animated as a drifting wisp of, um, scent, I guess. Someone else catches a whiff, and is compelled to follow the wisp to its source, all the while the nose is leading the way.

 

I really, really love following that wisp, or following my nose wherever it takes me. I actually believe it is not only stimulating, but also a very cool trait to have. The problem is the compelling nature of that image. The character always appears to have no real choice, again, a close parallel to the way my brain thinks.

 

It’s been a couple of years now since I received a diagnosis of ADD[2], after several years of close friends suggesting I may consider that there’s a slight chance that I may have a bit of a smattering of attention issues. For a number of reasons, I dismissed those suggestions as the overzealousness of the newly converted (or, I’m embarrassed to say, what I considered to be the obsessively converted), as well as stemming from our culture’s preoccupation with perfection, and said culture’s linear rigidity and its consequent patholigizing (that should be a word, too) of difference in learning, and thinking. I’ll risk sounding pompous (a quality I abhor), something which I most certainly am not, to admit that I really thought it was more about being intelligent and creative. A slightly scatter-brained quirkiness, but an endearing one, I like to think. bwaahahahaha! Ah, the idealism of the uninitiated inhabitant of a former police state’s evolution/devolution to anarchy.

 

Because I haven’t yet reconciled all of my dissonant thoughts and feelings on the topic, it’s hard for me to remember that this business of thinking/attention/ADD/intelligence/creativity isn’t an all-or-nothing or black-and-white issue. When I am undecided (often) or overly analytical (a prerequisite for residence on My Planet), I find myself grasping for The Rules and black-and-white, while simultaneously believing that said black-and-white constructs are helpful only as a basis upon which to build, not as structures in and of themselves. Consequently, I tend to live in a state of perpetual befuddlement, on this and most other issues, too.[3]

 

 

Everyone drifts. I know this, hence my previously long-standing resistance to the Label of ADD, which doesn’t have to be a Label, yet an explanation, unless I make it so. Working for so many years in the (soul-eating) corporate environment that I did, in deadline-driven positions, enabled me to obtain focus from external structure and panic. Additionally, piqued interest enables focus for the person with ADD, which was partly what kept ADD from causing me problems in my younger school years.

 

When I left my corporate job because I woke up sick to my stomach and sometimes sobbing at the prospect of suffocating yet another day, it was a good thing. Not one single person who I am close to thought I had made a mistake, not even my husband, who was most directly affected by my decision. 

 

Finally, I could follow wisps of my own choosing – time to do so and few external constraints on said drifting. Ironically (or perhaps I should say, “obviously, duh”), the lack of external structure leaves me unmoored and yes, adrift. It seems that I lack the inherent ability to mostly control my own focus. “Ah, look! A shiny pretty thing!”

 

Swear-to-God real-life (yet inconsequential) example: While was talking on the phone (via Bluetooth, to you curmudgeonly committee members, thank you) haranguing, er, talking with, my husband, I interjected, mid-harangue, “Oh, what pretty ponies!” and continued with my harangue, though with my attention deficit, he claims it was on another tangent (which, by the way, is an excellent word).

 

So the problem isn’t necessarily with Drift itself, but with the lack of parameters. I especially enjoy it when there is somewhere my daughter can play that her to do so unencumbered by my cautions and directives. The ideal play site is one with inherent physical boundaries and innately safe playthings, where “kids can be kids” without unrealistic, difficult adult expectations. She plays; I relax. Best of both worlds. Without those conditions, however, I am on alert, as is my job as mother of a four-year-old.

 

Accomplishing, doing, creating, well, focusing, is like that on My Planet. Without the externally-imposed structure (of school, work, routine), I am frequently stopped only when I call off the monkey bars or run in front of a car (and probably only just then remembering that I was heading for the reading or art section, anyway).

 

I’m only guessing here, but it’s possible that this partially explains my otherwise unaccounted for obsessive and inappropriate use of ellipses and parenthetical comments. I have other oddities that account for them, too, but I will not be sidetracked. No, I won’t. (But I *will* Alt-Tab to my other Word window to add to the other blog about Those Other Oddities.)

 

I (surprisingly) don’t know where I’m going with this, so I suppose I will abruptly end this exemplar of My Planet, summarized thusly: shit takes me way longer than it really should. If that is overstating, then certainly there are some very simple things take me longer than it does for other people. Ironically, one of the reasons I’ve always liked/loathed writing is that it crystallized my thinking and helped me focus. I call this entry “lazy man’s writing,” but honestly, it really is the best I can muster today. So I’ll have to skip over the analysis of that irony. I have enough fodder for befuddlement today. I think there’s one piece of cake left in the freezer. 

 

Don’t forget the fine print.[4][5]

 


[1] An entry for another day: my discomfort with the trend toward turning technology- and computer-related nouns into verbs, as well as and my compliance with said trend for the sake of simplicity, yet my

[2] Nowadays, the correct terminology and its attendant acronym is Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, with hyperactivity (AD/HD with hyperactivity) or Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, without hyperactivity (AD/HD without hyperactivity). I have the latter variety, and I think the new and “correct” designation is asinine, so I still call it ADD. Duh.

[3] Author wants to point out that the previous statement is not entirely true, but author is trying to remember that she doesn’t have to say EVERYTHING that pops into her head, previous paragraphs not withstanding, and that she doesn’t have to explain herself to the mind-numbing Nth degree to which she is presently so terribly inclined.

[4] Be advised that all included footnotes and parenthetical commentary and external responses to internal dialogue/arguments, while compulsively (and probably unwisely) included, are done so with the author’s full awareness, with tongue planted firmly in cheek. Author apologizes, but points out that said inclusions are intended as weak-yet-authentic, self-deprecating humor, as well as an exemplar of the difficulty the author has with staying focused. In other words, if it drives you crazy/wears you out/annoys you, just think how it would be to live there.

[5] Also, author is aware that there is medication for this, and thinks it is a miracle. However, author, despite seemingly contraindicating behavior, would like to get pregnant again.

Permalink 3 Comments

A few blurbs while I have a moment

September 16, 2008 at 9:44 pm (being a mom)

Background: Our community garage sale (which the more-placid offspring of Hurricane Ike attended) happened to fall on Q’s 4th birthday.

 

Negligent, selfish mommy: How’s my birthday girl?

Q: It’s *not* my birthday.

Negligent, selfish, yet oddly clueless mommy: It isn’t? Why not?

Q: Because you’re selling all my toys!

 

(In my defense, I can say that I had two dozen balloons and birthday paraphernalia aplenty, including a birthday girl hat and special hair bow, as well as a birthday cake later in the day, presents, and a party planned for next weekend.)

 

 

Q, upon being reminded to make a wish before blowing out the candles on her birthday cake:

 

I wish… I wish… I wish to eat up a cake!!

 

I love the sweet, in-the-moment and unintentional wisdom brought to me courtesy of children in general, and my child in particular. Then again, this might have just been Q latching onto something, anything, when prompted to produce under pressure. ;)

 

 

Scene: Q has odd scuba goggles on her face, ring-style Frisbees in each hand. She makes her way across the room, her arms making swimming/scooping motions with the Frisbees.

 

Q: Scoop, scoop, scoop, scoop….etc. ad nauseum

Me: Hey there! (or something equally brilliant) What are you doing?

Q: I’m a scoop-ah diver, Mommy.

 

 

Yeah, really. That’s all there is today. Seriously.

Permalink Leave a Comment

On early-childhood mothering and its influence in musical and literary taste, OR my new favorite song

September 8, 2008 at 12:06 pm (being a dork, being a mom)

I have a new car that came with a free trial of XM. There are 200+ stations, yet somehow I managed to end up listening to this song. As if that weren’t a sad enough state of affairs, I am now blogging about it after searching for the music and lyrics online. While listening to it, I laugh until I squeak and leak and also think of Jenny, who introduced me to Trout Fishing in America.

I hate to ruin the nail-biting anticipation by giving away the title of my new favorite song, but otherwise you won’t know which song to listen to. The song is “There’s A Carp In The Tub” by Robbie Schaefer. I recognize his voice and suspect he might sing a song about the ocean or perhaps another fish in a video I’ve seen on Noggin. (insert eye-rolling smiley here).

Tub carps in my world
shelter me from the horror
of The Cheetah Girls

On another note, I also heard a song on the same station by Devo. (Watch that video and explain to me how I ever thought they were completely cool.) Yes, Devo of “Are we not men? We are Devo!” and “Step on a crack, break your mama’s back.” On a kids’ station. Further research reveals that Devo has, appropriately enough, devolved into Devo 2.0, a group of kids under the kudzu that is Disney.

The board book version (but for some reason, not the full version) of Go, Dog. Go! by P.D. Eastman includes the line (surprisingly enough) “Go, dogs. Go! It’s not too late!” Of course you know just how I am compelled to finish that page: “…to whip it! Whip it good!” (Oh, that Alan!)

Permalink Leave a Comment

Next page »